Le jeudi 26 août 2010 à 00:51 -0700, David Miller a écrit :

From: Eric Dumazet <redacted>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:15:11 +0200

quoted

Yes, we can inline it, this will speedup the non vlan case as well :)

Agreed.

But I believe you can find a better place to put __napi_gro_receive()
than etherdevice.h, even though yes it does have a hard dependency on
that thing. :-)

I tried but failed :(

Or move __napi_gro_receive() in a new header,
because etherdevice.h needs to include netdevice.h

(is_etherdev_addr(), dev_hw_addr_random())