Re: [PATCH 6/13] bridge: Add core IGMP snooping support
From: Paul E. McKenney <hidden>
Date: 2010-03-10 16:27:01
From: Paul E. McKenney <hidden>
Date: 2010-03-10 16:27:01
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:07:29PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 05:13:18AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:quoted
If CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is set, rcu_dereference() checks for rcu_read_lock() and rcu_dereference_bh() checks for either rcu_read_lock_bh() or BH being disabled. Yes, this is a bit restrictive, but there are a few too many to check by hand these days.Fair enough. We should get those fixed then. In fact I reckon most of them should be using the BH variant so we might be able to kill a few rcu_read_lock's which would be a real gain.
I have -tip commit a898def29e4119bc01ebe7ca97423181f4c0ea2d that converts some of the rcu_dereference()s in net/core/filter.c, net/core/dev.c, net/decnet/dn_route.c, net/packet/af_packet.c, and net/ipv4/route.c to rcu_dereference_bh(). How should we coordinate the removal of the rcu_read_lock() calls? Thanx, Paul