Re: UDP regression with packets rates < 10k per sec
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2009-09-09 15:09:37
Christoph Lameter a écrit :
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Eric Dumazet wrote:quoted
In order to reproduce this here, could you tell me if you use Producer linux-2.6.22 -> Receiver 2.6.22 Producer linux-2.6.31 -> Receiver 2.6.31I use the above setup.
Then frames are sent on wire but not received (they are received via mc loop, internal stack magic) # ./mcast -L -n1 -r 10000 WARNING: Multiple active ethernet devices. Using local address 192.168.0.1 Receiver: Listening to control channel 239.0.192.1 Receiver: Subscribing to 1 MC addresses 239.0.192-254.2-254 offset 0 origin 192.168.0.1 Sender: Sending 10000 msgs/ch/sec on 1 channels. Probe interval=0.001-1 sec. TotalMsg Lost SeqErr TXDrop Msg/Sec KB/Sec Min/us Avg/us Max/us StdDv 100000 0 0 0 10000 3000.0 7.84 8.89 10.51 0.66 # uname -a Linux erd 2.6.30.5 #2 SMP Mon Sep 7 17:15:43 CEST 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux I tried an old kernel on same hardware : # ./mcast -L -n1 -r 10000 WARNING: Multiple active ethernet devices. Using local address 55.225.18.6 Receiver: Listening to control channel 239.0.192.1 Receiver: Subscribing to 1 MC addresses 239.0.192-254.2-254 offset 0 origin 55.225.18.6 Sender: Sending 10000 msgs/ch/sec on 1 channels. Probe interval=0.001-1 sec. TotalMsg Lost SeqErr TXDrop Msg/Sec KB/Sec Min/us Avg/us Max/us StdDv 99999 0 0 0 9998 0.0 9.00 9.95 14.50 1.56 Linux erd 2.6.9-55.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Apr 20 17:03:35 EDT 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux So my numbers seem much better than yours...