Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 3 authors, 2009-09-02

Re: [PATCH] net: sk_free() should be allowed right after sk_alloc()

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2009-08-31 12:02:06

From: Jarek Poplawski <redacted>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:30:19 +0000
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:15:36AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
From: Jarek Poplawski <redacted>

After commit 2b85a34e911bf483c27cfdd124aeb1605145dc80
(net: No more expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx)
sk_free() frees socks conditionally and depends
on sk_wmem_alloc beeing set e.g. in sock_init_data(). But in some
Very nice, but I hope David could fix btw. my "beeing" misspelling.
I will :-)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help