Re: [PATCH] net: sk_free() should be allowed right after sk_alloc()
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2009-08-31 12:02:06
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2009-08-31 12:02:06
From: Jarek Poplawski <redacted> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:30:19 +0000
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:15:36AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:quoted
From: Jarek Poplawski <redacted> After commit 2b85a34e911bf483c27cfdd124aeb1605145dc80 (net: No more expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx) sk_free() frees socks conditionally and depends on sk_wmem_alloc beeing set e.g. in sock_init_data(). But in someVery nice, but I hope David could fix btw. my "beeing" misspelling.
I will :-)