Re: [PATCH] net: Fix sock freeing before sock_init_data() with __sk_free() | netdev | Ratatoskr

[PATCH] net: Fix sock freeing before sock_init_data() with __sk_free() · Jarek Poplawski <hidden> · 2009-08-30
Re: [PATCH] net: Fix sock freeing before sock_init_data() with __sk_free() · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2009-08-31
Re: [PATCH] net: Fix sock freeing before sock_init_data() with __sk_free() · Jarek Poplawski <hidden> · 2009-08-31
Re: [PATCH] net: Fix sock freeing before sock_init_data() with __sk_free() · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2009-08-31
Re: [PATCH] net: Fix sock freeing before sock_init_data() with __sk_free() · Jarek Poplawski <hidden> · 2009-08-31
Re: [PATCH] net: Fix sock freeing before sock_init_data() with __sk_free() · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2009-08-31
Re: [PATCH] net: Fix sock freeing before sock_init_data() with __sk_free() · Jarek Poplawski <hidden> · 2009-08-31
[PATCH] net: sk_free() should be allowed right after sk_alloc() · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2009-08-31
Re: [PATCH] net: sk_free() should be allowed right after sk_alloc() · Jarek Poplawski <hidden> · 2009-08-31
Re: [PATCH] net: sk_free() should be allowed right after sk_alloc() · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2009-08-31
Re: [PATCH] net: sk_free() should be allowed right after sk_alloc() · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2009-08-31
Re: [PATCH] net: sk_free() should be allowed right after sk_alloc() · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2009-09-02

Re: [PATCH] net: Fix sock freeing before sock_init_data() with __sk_free()

From: Jarek Poplawski <hidden>
Date: 2009-08-31 07:26:02

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 09:18:46AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:

Jarek Poplawski a écrit :

quoted

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 08:50:25AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:

...

quoted

quoted

Well, patch is yours, not mine, and I am confident it is OK.

Well, it's from you, and I guess you'll sign off too, but if you
think so...
 
Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <redacted>

Thanks,
Jarek P.

Give me a few hours to review sk_alloc() call sites, test patch and officially submit it.

Thanks

Hmm... but you're "confident it is OK"?! (You know, I could've risked
my life or something... ;-)

Jarek P.