Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IPVS: use pr_err and friends instead of IP_VS_ERR and friends
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: 2009-07-28 23:33:40
Also in:
lkml, lvs-devel
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: 2009-07-28 23:33:40
Also in:
lkml, lvs-devel
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:56:55PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 22:35 +0200, Hannes Eder wrote:quoted
Since pr_err and friends is used instead of printk there is not point in keeping IP_VS_ERR and friends. + pr_err("Schedule: port zero only supported " + "in persistent services, " + "check your ipvs configuration\n");You might consider ignoring the checkpatch 80 char limit here and consolidate the message into a single string.
Personally, I prefer it the way it is.
It helps when grepping.quoted
@@ -377,8 +377,8 @@ static int ip_vs_svc_hash(struct ip_vs_service *svc) static int ip_vs_svc_unhash(struct ip_vs_service *svc) { if (!(svc->flags & IP_VS_SVC_F_HASHED)) { - IP_VS_ERR("ip_vs_svc_unhash(): request for unhash flagged, " - "called from %p\n", __builtin_return_address(0)); + pr_err("ip_vs_svc_unhash(): request for unhash flagged, " + "called from %p\n", __builtin_return_address(0));Maybe use something like: "%s(): <foo> called from %pf", __func__, __builtin_return_address(0) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/