From: Alexey Kuznetsov <redacted>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:59:50 +0400
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 05:43:15AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
quoted
Maybe it can work, but it needs a thorough checking now and adds a new
code path to track later while looking for bugs. So, I wonder if it's
not better to link such dsts in rt_intern_hash anyway, probably as a
separate list, scanned only for expired entries.
Such a list already exists, it is gc list in core/dst.c.
The fix to the problem could be replacing rt_drop() with rt_free()
(adding rt_free() after the patch, which deleted rt_drop()), something like:
if (!rt_caching(dev_net(rt->u.dst.dev))) {
/* ..... */
+ rt_free(rt);
goto report_and_exit;
}
rt_free() will put the route on that gc list and it will be releases
as soon as refcnt becomes 0.
That should work.
Can someone put together a formal patch and give it at least
a quick test?
Thanks!