Re: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock
From: Peter W. Morreale <hidden>
Date: 2009-03-19 12:59:42
Also in:
linux-rt-users, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2009-04-02 · Re: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock · Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- 2009-04-02 · Re: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock · Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- 2009-03-23 · Re: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock · Jarek Poplawski <hidden>
- 2009-03-23 · Re: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
- 2009-03-23 · Re: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock · Eric Dumazet <hidden>
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 21:54 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
Vernon Mauery [off-list ref] writes:quoted
But then again I'm not sure it's worth it if the problem only happens in out of tree RT.
Heh. That darn bastard child again, eh? :-) Recall that adaptive spin,developed in RT, is now in mainline. Best, -PWM