Re: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2009-03-19 05:38:33
Also in:
linux-rt-users, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2009-04-02 · Re: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock · Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- 2009-04-02 · Re: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock · Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- 2009-03-23 · Re: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock · Jarek Poplawski <hidden>
- 2009-03-23 · Re: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
- 2009-03-23 · Re: High contention on the sk_buff_head.lock · Eric Dumazet <hidden>
From: Gregory Haskins <redacted> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:48:46 -0400
To see this in action, try taking a moderately large smp system (8-way+) and scaling the number of flows.
I can maintain line-rate over 10GB with a 64-cpu box. It's not a problem.