Re: Marvell 88E609x switch?
From: Lennert Buytenhek <hidden>
Date: 2009-03-10 09:43:14
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 08:22:17AM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
You should write 0x003E ... see attached patchUps, I see (from the thread) that you have already done/tried this...Yes, although I think it will need some work in the future (I've set it to 1000Mb connection, you said you used 100Mb, etc) Question: I'm testing this by trying a ping out of my box. Linux replies by sending an ARP packet out, and the destination replies with an ARP packet in. I can see from the ethtool stats that the reply packets get into lan1.1 (the physical port I'm using), but I don't see them get moved through the CPU port. My understanding is that this should work via the VLAN map? I checked that setup and it looks OK. Any ideas where this might be going wrong?I also just noticed that the ESA registers (Global 1,2,3) aren't set at all.
This is done by mv88e6xxx_set_addr_{in,}direct() in mv88e6xxx.c,
via the ->set_addr() callback.