Re: Marvell 88E609x switch?
From: Gary Thomas <hidden>
Date: 2009-02-27 12:42:54
Gary Thomas wrote:
Lennert Buytenhek wrote:quoted
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 06:12:32PM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Is there support for this device anywhere? In particular, the M88E6095 switch.Not at the moment, but it should be easy enough to add. If your board already runs on 2.6.28+, I can whip up some patches for you to try from the docs I have for that part.That would be much appreciated, thanks.I noticed that the 6095/6095F are quite similar to the 6131 as far as the register set goes. So something along these lines (hacky patch, breaks 6131, not for mainline) might just work to detect single 6095s (cascading DSA chips is something that needs more work, let's get the single-chip case working first). The other thing you'll need to do is create dsa platform devices for your switch chips, a la how it's done in arch/arm/mach-orion5x/ or arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/ for example -- you need to pass in a struct device * for your network device, a struct device * for your mii bus, the switch MII address on the MII bus, and names of the individual ports (where you'll specify "cpu" for the port on the switch chip that the CPU is connected to). Let me know if this works.Thanks, I'll give it a try. It will take a little effort to get setup as I have to work within the open firmware structure (that's how all the various components are specified).Right, we don't have OF bindings yet. I guess this would make sense to do generically at some point, since there are quite a few PPC platforms with DSA switch chips.Here's what I tried - (patch attached) - a trulyhorrible hack, but I've not figured out how to get the correct device pointers from the OF world yet. The boot log shows that it's trying, but I don't see the DSA layer (M88E690x driver) doing the MII indirection that's needed for this device. I'm probably not starting it up correctly, but I think I followed the examples you cited. Any ideas?"indirection needed for this device" -- does that mean that your switch chip is configured to use the multi-chip addressing mode? (It looks like it, as most of the MII addresses return ffff in their ID registers.) If yes, you should set ->sw_addr to whatever MII address the chip has been assigned.Much better, my switch seems to be found now. Distributed Switch Architecture driver version 0.1 gfar_mdio_read(cf9db400, 1, 0) = 1811 gfar_mdio_write(cf9db400, 1, 0, 9a03) = 0 gfar_mdio_read(cf9db400, 1, 0) = 1a03 gfar_mdio_read(cf9db400, 1, 1) = 953 mv88e6131_probe(cf9db400, 1) = 2387 eth0: detected a Marvell 88E6095/88E6095F switch ... root@ppc_target:~ ls /sys/bus/mdio_bus/devices/ 24520:01:00 24520:01:02 24520:01:04 24520:01:06 24520:01:01 24520:01:03 24520:01:05 24520:01:07 However, the network subsystem still can't locate it. It may be a complication of the OF stuff and how the [gianfar] network device knows what PHY to look at. starting network interfaces... 24520:01 not found eth0: Could not attach to PHY Also, how do I specify the [implicit] route within the switch that connects '24520:01:00' to the CPU port '24520:01:0A' (if there was such a thing)? My boot loader has configured the switch for this path - I've not looked through the log to see what the DSA layer did. Thanks for your help
Trying the simple/obvious did not work so well: Distributed Switch Architecture driver version 0.1 mv88e6131_probe(cf9db400, 1) = 2387 eth0: detected a Marvell 88E6095/88E6095F switch dsa slave smi: probed lan1.2: 24520:01:00 already attached Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000024 Faulting instruction address: 0xc019e584 Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] ASP8347E Modules linked in: NIP: c019e584 LR: c019e570 CTR: c018a734 REGS: cf821c40 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted (2.6.28-svn4872-dirty) MSR: 00009032 <EE,ME,IR,DR> CR: 22000024 XER: 20000000 DAR: 00000024, DSISR: 20000000 TASK = cf81f900[1] 'swapper' THREAD: cf820000 GPR00: 00000001 cf821cf0 cf81f900 cf9ff200 00001697 ffffffff c018aeec 00004000 GPR08: 00000001 00000000 00003fff cf9ff200 82000022 7e700000 00050000 00019edc GPR16: fffffffd 00050000 00043514 00044320 000434e8 c0362e88 c02f8f9c cf854800 GPR24: cf8549c0 00000001 00000001 c0362e88 cf854800 cf9ff3b8 cf9f9b80 cf9ff200 NIP [c019e584] phy_start_aneg+0x34/0xcc LR [c019e570] phy_start_aneg+0x20/0xcc Call Trace: [cf821cf0] [c019ff0c] phy_attach+0x140/0x148 (unreliable) [cf821d10] [c025ae3c] dsa_slave_create+0x16c/0x1ac [cf821d30] [c025aa9c] dsa_probe+0x428/0x454 [cf821d70] [c0193cc4] platform_drv_probe+0x20/0x30 [cf821d80] [c0192ae0] driver_probe_device+0xb4/0x1e8 [cf821da0] [c0192cb8] __driver_attach+0xa4/0xa8 [cf821dc0] [c0192278] bus_for_each_dev+0x5c/0xa4 [cf821df0] [c01928fc] driver_attach+0x24/0x34 [cf821e00] [c0191b90] bus_add_driver+0x1d8/0x24c [cf821e20] [c0192ed8] driver_register+0x70/0x160 [cf821e40] [c0193f94] platform_driver_register+0xac/0xbc [cf821e50] [c0339828] dsa_init_module+0x18/0x28 [cf821e60] [c0003874] do_one_initcall+0x38/0x194 [cf821fc0] [c031a178] kernel_init+0x94/0x100 [cf821ff0] [c0010df8] kernel_thread+0x4c/0x68 Ideas? -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------