Thread (58 messages) 58 messages, 5 authors, 2009-03-10

Re: Marvell 88E609x switch?

From: Gary Thomas <hidden>
Date: 2009-02-27 12:42:54

Gary Thomas wrote:
Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 06:12:32PM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Is there support for this device anywhere?  In particular,
the M88E6095 switch.
Not at the moment, but it should be easy enough to add.  If your
board already runs on 2.6.28+, I can whip up some patches for you
to try from the docs I have for that part.
That would be much appreciated, thanks.
I noticed that the 6095/6095F are quite similar to the 6131 as far
as the register set goes.  So something along these lines (hacky
patch, breaks 6131, not for mainline) might just work to detect
single 6095s (cascading DSA chips is something that needs more work,
let's get the single-chip case working first).

The other thing you'll need to do is create dsa platform devices
for your switch chips, a la how it's done in arch/arm/mach-orion5x/
or arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/ for example -- you need to pass in a struct
device * for your network device, a struct device * for your mii bus,
the switch MII address on the MII bus, and names of the individual
ports (where you'll specify "cpu" for the port on the switch chip that
the CPU is connected to).

Let me know if this works.
Thanks, I'll give it a try.  It will take a little effort
to get setup as I have to work within the open firmware
structure (that's how all the various components are
specified).
Right, we don't have OF bindings yet.  I guess this would make sense
to do generically at some point, since there are quite a few PPC
platforms with DSA switch chips.
Here's what I tried - (patch attached) - a trulyhorrible hack,
but I've not figured out how to get the correct device pointers
from the OF world yet.  The boot log shows that it's trying, but
I don't see the DSA layer (M88E690x driver) doing the MII indirection
that's needed for this device.

I'm probably not starting it up correctly, but I think I followed
the examples you cited.  Any ideas?
"indirection needed for this device" -- does that mean that your
switch chip is configured to use the multi-chip addressing mode?
(It looks like it, as most of the MII addresses return ffff in
their ID registers.)  If yes, you should set ->sw_addr to whatever
MII address the chip has been assigned.
Much better, my switch seems to be found now.

  Distributed Switch Architecture driver version 0.1
  gfar_mdio_read(cf9db400, 1, 0) = 1811
  gfar_mdio_write(cf9db400, 1, 0, 9a03) = 0
  gfar_mdio_read(cf9db400, 1, 0) = 1a03
  gfar_mdio_read(cf9db400, 1, 1) = 953
  mv88e6131_probe(cf9db400, 1) = 2387
  eth0: detected a Marvell 88E6095/88E6095F switch
     ...
  root@ppc_target:~ ls /sys/bus/mdio_bus/devices/
  24520:01:00  24520:01:02  24520:01:04  24520:01:06
  24520:01:01  24520:01:03  24520:01:05  24520:01:07

However, the network subsystem still can't locate it.  It may be
a complication of the OF stuff and how the [gianfar] network
device knows what PHY to look at.

  starting network interfaces...
  24520:01 not found
  eth0: Could not attach to PHY

Also, how do I specify the [implicit] route within the switch
that connects '24520:01:00' to the CPU port '24520:01:0A' (if
there was such a thing)?  My boot loader has configured the
switch for this path - I've not looked through the log to see
what the DSA layer did.

Thanks for your help
Trying the simple/obvious did not work so well:
  Distributed Switch Architecture driver version 0.1
  mv88e6131_probe(cf9db400, 1) = 2387
  eth0: detected a Marvell 88E6095/88E6095F switch
  dsa slave smi: probed
  lan1.2: 24520:01:00 already attached
  Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000024
  Faulting instruction address: 0xc019e584
  Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
  ASP8347E
  Modules linked in:
  NIP: c019e584 LR: c019e570 CTR: c018a734
  REGS: cf821c40 TRAP: 0300   Not tainted  (2.6.28-svn4872-dirty)
  MSR: 00009032 <EE,ME,IR,DR>  CR: 22000024  XER: 20000000
  DAR: 00000024, DSISR: 20000000
  TASK = cf81f900[1] 'swapper' THREAD: cf820000
  GPR00: 00000001 cf821cf0 cf81f900 cf9ff200 00001697 ffffffff c018aeec 00004000
  GPR08: 00000001 00000000 00003fff cf9ff200 82000022 7e700000 00050000 00019edc
  GPR16: fffffffd 00050000 00043514 00044320 000434e8 c0362e88 c02f8f9c cf854800
  GPR24: cf8549c0 00000001 00000001 c0362e88 cf854800 cf9ff3b8 cf9f9b80 cf9ff200
  NIP [c019e584] phy_start_aneg+0x34/0xcc
  LR [c019e570] phy_start_aneg+0x20/0xcc
  Call Trace:
  [cf821cf0] [c019ff0c] phy_attach+0x140/0x148 (unreliable)
  [cf821d10] [c025ae3c] dsa_slave_create+0x16c/0x1ac
  [cf821d30] [c025aa9c] dsa_probe+0x428/0x454
  [cf821d70] [c0193cc4] platform_drv_probe+0x20/0x30
  [cf821d80] [c0192ae0] driver_probe_device+0xb4/0x1e8
  [cf821da0] [c0192cb8] __driver_attach+0xa4/0xa8
  [cf821dc0] [c0192278] bus_for_each_dev+0x5c/0xa4
  [cf821df0] [c01928fc] driver_attach+0x24/0x34
  [cf821e00] [c0191b90] bus_add_driver+0x1d8/0x24c
  [cf821e20] [c0192ed8] driver_register+0x70/0x160
  [cf821e40] [c0193f94] platform_driver_register+0xac/0xbc
  [cf821e50] [c0339828] dsa_init_module+0x18/0x28
  [cf821e60] [c0003874] do_one_initcall+0x38/0x194
  [cf821fc0] [c031a178] kernel_init+0x94/0x100
  [cf821ff0] [c0010df8] kernel_thread+0x4c/0x68

Ideas?

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help