From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <redacted>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:44:37 +0200

From: Ilpo Järvinen <redacted>

It seems that implementation in yeah was inconsistent to what
other did as it would increase cwnd one ack earlier than the
others do.

Size benefits:

  bictcp_cong_avoid |  -36
  tcp_cong_avoid_ai |  +52
  bictcp_cong_avoid |  -34
  tcp_scalable_cong_avoid |  -36
  tcp_veno_cong_avoid |  -12
  tcp_yeah_cong_avoid |  -38

= -104 bytes total

Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <redacted>

Applied, nice work.