From: Andrew Grover <redacted>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:43:27 -0800

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:28 PM, David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Furthermore the port you've choosen for the protocol is arbitrary, not
properly allocated with the appropriate standards committee, and
therefore could conflict with something other people are using.

I'm sure allocating the port won't be too big an issue.

Ok, I added the RDS code to the net-next-2.6 tree, changing
AF_RDS to be 21