Patrick McHardy wrote:

Herbert Xu wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 06:23:33AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:

quoted

An easy fix would be to keep track of whether sysctl unregistration
is in progress in IPv4/IPv6 and ignore new requests from that point
on. Its not very elegant though, so I was wondering whether anyone
has a better suggestion.

We could make the unregistration asynchronous and invoke a callback
when it's done.  Then we can simply hold a net_device refcount and
relinquish it in the callback

That sounds simple enough. I'll see if I can come up with a patch, thanks.

Unfortunately its more complicated than I thought because of
device renames, where the sysctl pointer is reused after
unregistration and the rename/unregistration/re-registration
should be atomic. Deferring unregistration means we can't perform
the new registration immediately unless we allow multiple
registrations for a single device to be active simulaneously,
which introduces a whole new set of problems.

Simply ignoring the request during unregistration doesn't seem
so bad after all, the main problem is that it intoduces a different
race on renames where a write to the "forwarding" file returns
success, but the change doesn't take effect. We could return
-ENOENT, but that seems a bit strange after open() returned success.
Maybe -EBUSY, although I would prefer to make this transparent
to userspace.

Another alternative would be to simply not take the RTNL in
the sysctl handler since we're already taking dev_base_lock
before performing any forwaring changes. But in case of IPv4
we need it for disabling LRO.

I think I'm stuck. Will rethink it after some coffee :)