Re: [PATCH 0/6] fs: Scalability of sockets/pipes allocation/deallocation on SMP
From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2008-11-27 01:38:27
Also in:
lkml
From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2008-11-27 01:38:27
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Eric Dumazet wrote:
The last point is about SLUB being hit hard, unless we use slub_min_order=3 at boot, or we use Christoph Lameter patch (struct file RCU optimizations) http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/418615 If we boot machine with slub_min_order=3, SLUB overhead disappears.
I'd rather not be that drastic. Did you try increasing slub_min_objects instead? Try 40-100. If we find the right number then we should update the tuning to make sure that it pickes the right slab page sizes.