Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3
From: Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
Date: 2008-09-04 20:37:23
Also in:
linux-next, lkml
Andrew Morton [off-list ref] writes:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 11:05:21 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
This is a pull of your tree from yesterday, ending at commit fbb16e243887332dd5754e48ffe5b963378f3cd2There's been various suggested patches by Al/Eric (added to cc) for /proc/net handling, but none of them have actually even been merged yet. So I don't think this code has changed in a while. Al, Eric, ideas?
There aren't any issues I know of with normal configurations and the current proc code.
I don't think I saw it on any other test machines. This machine runs SELinux. Distro is FC5.
quoted
quoted
config: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/config-sony.txt dmesg: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-sony-without.txtThat whole thing should just be a simple symlink: fs/proc/proc_net.c: proc_symlink("net", NULL, "self/net");/proc/self/net looks fine.quoted
are you sure it's a plain tree of mine, without any of the patches floating around between Eric/Al?yup, it's yesterday's mainline.
Does the problem happen if you disable selinux? This feels like a case of selinux being over zealous. Eric