Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2008-09-04

Re: linux-next: Tree for September 3

From: Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
Date: 2008-09-04 20:37:23
Also in: lkml, netdev

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Andrew Morton [off-list ref] writes:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 11:05:21 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
This is a pull of your tree from yesterday, ending at commit 
fbb16e243887332dd5754e48ffe5b963378f3cd2
There's been various suggested patches by Al/Eric (added to cc) for 
/proc/net handling, but none of them have actually even been merged yet. 
So I don't think this code has changed in a while. 

Al, Eric, ideas?
There aren't any issues I know of with normal configurations
and the current proc code.
I don't think I saw it on any other test machines.

This machine runs SELinux.  Distro is FC5.
quoted
quoted
config: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/config-sony.txt
dmesg: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-sony-without.txt
That whole thing should just be a simple symlink:

	fs/proc/proc_net.c:     proc_symlink("net", NULL, "self/net");
/proc/self/net looks fine.
quoted
are you sure it's a plain tree of mine, without any of the patches 
floating around between Eric/Al?
yup, it's yesterday's mainline.
Does the problem happen if you disable selinux?

This feels like a case of selinux being over zealous.

Eric
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help