Thread (228 messages) 228 messages, 7 authors, 2008-12-18

Re: net-next-2.6 [pull-request] [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Revised set of feature-negotiation patches

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2008-09-22 06:59:05

From: Gerrit Renker <redacted>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:28:07 +0200
| There are two paths forward at the current point in time.
| 
| 1) You submit a very small group of patches at a time to me.
|    I'm talking like 5 or 6 patches at a time, maximum.
| 
|    And I'm going to give extra amounts of personal review to
|    these, so it will take even more time than usual.
| 
Further review can never harm, so I am sure this will be good.

I have a question regarding granularity - the current granularity is
meant to be logical, but is low.
It is easy to get distracted by the details since at the end of
the day the 37 patches achieve a rewriting of feat.c in small steps.

Would you therefore be ok with me combining some of the patches or would
you prefer to review the set at its current granularity?
Current granularity.

So, submit about 5 pieces at a time, you can say at the beginning of
the series (in the [PATCH 0/X]: email) something like "this is phase N
in the rewriting of feat.c which will achieve X Y and Z"
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help