Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review
From: Jay Cliburn <hidden>
Date: 2008-06-08 15:38:54
Also in:
lkml
On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 07:10:51 -0700 (PDT) David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
If you ask me in the future about the status of a -stable patch from the networking, I'll let you know exactly what is happening to that patch wrt. stable. I rarely forget to submit an appropriate patch, and when I do forget you merely have to let me know (rather than submitting it to -stable directly, please don't do that) so that I can fit it in with what I plan to submit to -stable already.
As a netdev driver maintainer, I've been following this workflow for patches that need to go to -stable: 1. I submit a mainline patch to Jeff Garzik. 2. Jeff submits to David. 3. David submits to Linus. 4. Linus merges patch into mainline. 5. I extract mainline commit ID. 6. I apply and test patch against appropriate 2.6.x.y git tree. 7. I submit patch directly to -stable. David's admonition tells me I'm doing it wrong, and that I should submit the stable patch to Jeff as well. Am I right? Jay