On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 03:41:01PM +0300, Valentine Barshak wrote:

quoted

+	pasemi_mac_tx_intr(mac->tx->chan.irq, mac->tx);
+	enable_irq(mac->tx->chan.irq);
+
+	disable_irq(mac->rx->chan.irq);
+	pasemi_mac_rx_intr(mac->rx->chan.irq, dev);

Shouldn't this actually be pasemi_mac_rx_intr(mac->rx->chan.irq, mac->rx)?

Yeah, it should. It used to take the netdev pointer instead. And the
void * argument means I never got a compiler warning from it.

Thanks!

-Olof