Re: SACK scoreboard
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2008-01-09 06:39:26
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2008-01-09 · Re: SACK scoreboard · <hidden>
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2008-01-09 06:39:26
From: Andi Kleen <redacted> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:25:05 +0100
David Miller [off-list ref] writes:quoted
The big problem is that recovery from even a single packet loss in a window makes us run kfree_skb() for a all the packets in a full window's worth of data when recovery completes.Why exactly is it a problem to free them all at once? Are you worried about kernel preemption latencies?
If the cpu is there spinning freeing up 500,000 SKBs, it isn't processing RX packets. It adds severe spikes in CPU utilization that are even moderate line rates begins to affect RTTs. Or do you think it's OK to process 500,000 SKBs while locked in a software interrupt. Perhaps you have another broken awk script to prove this :-)