Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 3 authors, 2007-10-26

Re: [2.6 patch] always export sysctl_{r,w}mem_max

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2007-10-26 23:43:26
Also in: lkml

From: Rick Jones <redacted>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:31:47 -0700
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
quoted
Adrian Bunk [off-list ref] writes:

quoted
This patch fixes the following build error with CONFIG_SYSCTL=n:

<--  snip  -->

...
ERROR: "sysctl_rmem_max" [fs/dlm/dlm.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "sysctl_wmem_max" [drivers/net/rrunner.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "sysctl_rmem_max" [drivers/net/rrunner.ko] undefined!
make[2]: *** [__modpost] Error 1

I was going to ask if allowing drivers to increase rmem_max
is something that we want to do.  Apparently the road runner
driver has been doing this since the 2.6.12-rc1 when the
git repository starts so this probably isn't a latent bug.
Although it does rather sound like a driver writer yanking the rope from the 
hand's of the sysadmin and hanging him with it rather than letting the sysadmin 
do it himself.  I've seen other drivers' README's suggesting larger mem's but 
not their sources doing it.
I really don't think what the roadrunner driver is doing is
correct at all.

I also think what DLM is doing is wrong too.

If DLM really wants minimum, it can use SO_SNDBUFFORCE and
SO_RCVBUFFORCE socket options and use whatever limits it
likes.

But even this is questionable.

I'll put in Adrian's patch to fix the build as a first
priority, but in the long term this cruft has gotta go.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help