On 9/12/07, Jay Vosburgh [off-list ref] wrote:
Andy Gospodarek [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I could do that, or we could just take this as-is and get initscripts
fixed up to account for this. Does that seem reasonable?
Changing initscripts is fine, too, but is there then going to be
some (perhaps small) installed base for which the documentation will be
incorrect?
Sure, but it could be wrong if we updated the kernel doc again after
initscripts was fixed and some chose not to update initscripts on
their boxes. There could be a note about running a particular version
of initscripts, but I'd rather not start down the path of turning the
kernel doc into something that looks like distro release notes.
Either way it seems like there could be a chance for something to be
out of sync, so I guess we just have to pick the one that seems 'least
bad.' I'd vote for whatever creates the fewest kernel patches. ;-)