Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 7 authors, 2007-07-31

Re: [PATCH RFC]: napi_struct V4

From: Roland Dreier <hidden>
Date: 2007-07-28 15:27:28

 > Most drivers are in good shape, although some still have very
 > questionable netif_rx_complete() handling, in that racy area that
 > Rusty and myself were discussing today.
 > 
 > My inclination is to wrap those sequences around with an IRQ
 > safe spinlock to fix the race provably, and then if driver
 > authors want to optimize that away with techniques like those
 > that tg3, bnx2, sky2, skge et al. use, that's fine but can
 > be done later.

Ouch... that extra lock seems pretty expensive.  Also I'm having a
hard time understanding how the techniques you're alluding to apply to
devices that may miss events when enabling interrupts; the drivers you
mention all seem to be for devices that didn't have the race and
didn't use netif_rx_reschedule() in the old NAPI world.  Can you
provide a little more detail on how the lock could be optimized away?

Thanks,
  Roland
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help