Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 5 authors, 2007-01-02
  • (off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
  • pktgen (was Re: tests of kernel modules) · Alexey Dobriyan <hidden> · 2006-11-21
  • Re: pktgen · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2006-11-28
  • Re: pktgen · Alexey Dobriyan <hidden> · 2006-11-29
  • Re: pktgen · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2006-11-30
  • Re: pktgen · Alexey Dobriyan <hidden> · 2006-11-30
  • Re: pktgen · Robert Olsson <hidden> · 2006-11-30
  • Re: pktgen · Ben Greear <hidden> · 2006-11-30
  • Re: pktgen · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2006-12-01
  • Re: pktgen · Robert Olsson <hidden> · 2006-12-01
  • Re: pktgen · Alexey Dobriyan <hidden> · 2006-12-01
  • Re: pktgen · Robert Olsson <hidden> · 2006-12-01
  • Re: pktgen · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2006-12-01
  • Re: pktgen · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2007-01-02
  • Re: pktgen · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2006-12-01
  • Re: pktgen · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2006-12-01

Re: pktgen

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2006-12-01 23:25:45

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

From: "Alexey Dobriyan" <redacted>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:51:53 +0300
On 12/1/06, Robert Olsson [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
David Miller writes:
 > Agreed.
 >
 > Robert, please fix this by using a completion so that we can
 > wait for the threads to start up, something like this:

Included. It passes my test but Alexey and others test.
Confused now. Is my "t->control &= ~(T_TERMINATE);" fix deprecated by
completions?
The completions solve the bug completely.

But later on we should integate a change that eliminates
these spurious t->control bit clears at the start of the
pktgen thread execution, it just isn't needed to fix the
bug so we can make it later.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help