Re: pktgen
From: Ben Greear <hidden>
Date: 2006-11-30 17:32:21
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2004-11-29 · Re: pktgen · Grant Grundler <hidden>
- 2004-11-29 · Re: pktgen · Robert Olsson <hidden>
- 2004-11-29 · Re: pktgen · jamal <hidden>
- 2004-11-28 · Re: pktgen · Lennert Buytenhek <hidden>
- 2004-11-27 · Re: pktgen · jamal <hidden>
Robert Olsson wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Hello! Seems you found a race when rmmod is done before it's fully started Try:diff --git a/net/core/pktgen.c b/net/core/pktgen.c index 733d86d..ac0b4b1 100644 --- a/net/core/pktgen.c +++ b/net/core/pktgen.c@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ #include <asm/div64.h> /* do_div */ #include <asm/timex.h> -#define VERSION "pktgen v2.68: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.\n" +#define VERSION "pktgen v2.69: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.\n" /* #define PG_DEBUG(a) a */ #define PG_DEBUG(a)@@ -3673,6 +3673,8 @@ static void __exit pg_cleanup(void) struct list_head *q, *n; wait_queue_head_t queue; init_waitqueue_head(&queue); + + schedule_timeout_interruptible(msecs_to_jiffies(125)); /* Stop all interfaces & threads */
That strikes me as a hack..surely there is a better method than just adding a sleep?? Ben -- Ben Greear [off-list ref] Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com