On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 13:53 -0700, David Miller wrote:

From: Tom Tucker <redacted>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:47:13 -0500

quoted

I concede that features have been lost, but some applications benefit
greatly from RDMA. For these applications and these customers,

TOE folks give the same story... it's a broken record, really.

Let us know when you can say something new about the situation.

Under Linux we get to make better long term architectually sane
decisions, even if it is to the dismay of the backers of certain
short-sighted pieces of technology.

Would you indulge me with one final clarification?  

- Are you condemning RDMA over TCP as an ill-conceived technology?

- Are you condemning the implementation of iWARP? 

- Are you condemning both?

Thanks,
Tom