On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Tom Tucker wrote:

On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 12:46 -0700, David Miller wrote:

quoted

From: Roland Dreier <redacted>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 09:54:37 -0700

quoted

In any case I think we need to find a way for Linux to support iWARP
hardware, since there are users that want this, and (some of) the
vendors are working hard to do things the right way (including cc'ing
netdev on the conversation).  I don't think it's good for Linux for
the answer to just be, "sorry, you're wrong to want to use that hardware."

We give the same response for TOE stuff.

What does the word "we" represent in this context? Is it the Linux
community at large, Linux and Andrew, you? I'm not trying to be
argumentative, I just want to understand how carefully and by whom iWARP
technology has been considered.

$ grep -ri davem /usr/src/linux



- James
-- 
James Morris
[off-list ref]