Thread (10 messages) flat view 10 messages, 4 authors, 2005-05-25

Re: [PATCH] Super TSO v3

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: 2005-05-24 00:32:08

On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:19:43PM +0000, David S. Miller wrote:
The guts of the logic is in tcp_tso_should_defer().  And
when dealing with a TSO frame, tcp_write_xmit() calls
this instead of tcp_nagle_test().  So you can view this
deferral as a sort of "TSO Nagle".
Should we skip this step if the socket has Nagle turned off?

Also why are we doing this check in tcp_push_one? The only
way we can get there is if the TSO goal has been reached
or there is out-of-band stuff to send.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help