Re: dummy as IMQ replacement
From: Hasso Tepper <hidden>
Date: 2005-01-31 13:02:56
jamal wrote:
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 07:38, Hasso Tepper wrote:quoted
jamal wrote:quoted
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 03:20, Hasso Tepper wrote:quoted
Policing didn't work with IPv6 last time I checked.Really? I take it this is using the u32 classifier? What filter did you use?http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q2/012422.html Got one answer to this in private that "AFAIK it isn't implemented yet".This? tc filter add dev eth1.101 parent ffff: protocol all prio 50 handle \ 0x101 fw police rate 1024kbit burst 60k drop flowid :101 What are you trying to do? Are you also trying to rate limit ARPs etc in one shot?
All traffic coming from eth1.101 interface.
Does this even get hit at all? tc -s would show you stats. I suspect for one it is not being hit.
As far as I remember situation was exactly as I described. This worked for IPv4 traffic, but not for IPv6 traffic.
Maybe you are trying to use iptables marks that happen a long time after the ingress has seen the packets (which would explain why it is not being hit)? This would be true kernels > 2.6.8 but not before ..
This test was done with 2.6.6.
In other words, it may be a config issue.
Would be nice ;).
If you tell me what it is you are trying to do i could try and set it up when i come back from work today.
I'd like to limit _all_ traffic coming in from one particular interface to the one common limit. No matter what traffic it is - IPv4 or IPv6. Sum of traffic should be the one I specify. -- Hasso Tepper Elion Enterprises Ltd. WAN administrator