Re: dummy as IMQ replacement
From: jamal <hidden>
Date: 2005-01-31 12:47:53
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 07:38, Hasso Tepper wrote:
jamal wrote:quoted
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 03:20, Hasso Tepper wrote:quoted
Policing didn't work with IPv6 last time I checked.Really? I take it this is using the u32 classifier? What filter did you use?http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q2/012422.html Got one answer to this in private that "AFAIK it isn't implemented yet".
This? tc filter add dev eth1.101 parent ffff: protocol all prio 50 handle \ 0x101 fw police rate 1024kbit burst 60k drop flowid :101 What are you trying to do? Are you also trying to rate limit ARPs etc in one shot? Does this even get hit at all? tc -s would show you stats. I suspect for one it is not being hit. Maybe you are trying to use iptables marks that happen a long time after the ingress has seen the packets (which would explain why it is not being hit)? This would be true kernels > 2.6.8 but not before .. In other words, it may be a config issue. If you tell me what it is you are trying to do i could try and set it up when i come back from work today. cheers, jamal