Thread (46 messages) 46 messages, 8 authors, 2005-02-04

Re: dummy as IMQ replacement

From: jamal <hidden>
Date: 2005-01-31 12:47:53

On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 07:38, Hasso Tepper wrote:
jamal wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 03:20, Hasso Tepper wrote:
quoted
Policing didn't work with IPv6 last time I checked.
Really? I take it this is using the u32 classifier?
What filter did you use?
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q2/012422.html

Got one answer to this in private that "AFAIK it isn't implemented yet".
This?

tc filter add dev eth1.101 parent ffff: protocol all prio 50 handle \
0x101 fw police rate 1024kbit burst 60k drop flowid :101

What are you trying to do? Are you also trying to rate limit ARPs etc
in one shot?

Does this even get hit at all? tc -s would show you stats. I suspect
for one it is not being hit.
Maybe you are trying to use iptables marks that happen
a long time after the ingress has seen the packets (which would 
explain why it is not being hit)? This would be true kernels > 2.6.8 
but not before ..
In other words, it may be a config issue.
If you tell me what it is you are trying to do i could try and set it
up when i come back from work today.

cheers,
jamal
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help