Re: Re[2]: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872..
From: Bart De Schuymer <hidden>
Date: 2004-12-18 16:43:26
Also in:
lkml
Op za, 18-12-2004 te 19:07 +0300, schreef Crazy AMD K7:
quoted
Note to the original poster: when you report a bug with a patched kernel always mention it.I have mentioned earlier and Bart knows it. I use 2.4.28 + ebtables-brnf-8_vs_2.4.28.diff + U32 patch from patch-o-matic-ng-20040621.tar.bz2 + patch for br_netfilter.c made by Bart to find out why kernel panic happens(it was a few letters ago) All patches has applies cleanly. U32 doesn't affect on br_netfilter.c
Sorry, I don't know the ip_queue mechanism and I don't know what could possibly go wrong. All we know is that you no longer have kernel panics with the simple patch I gave you (which just drops packets when a kernel panic would happen otherwise, and tells about this with a printk). However, you state there are no entries in your syslog that tell about this dropping. Is your syslog working right? Do you have a console open on which kernel messages get printed? I still secretly suspect the snort code of inserting packets back into the kernel that don't have an output device (I don't know if that's possible, though). cheers, Bart