Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 9 authors, 2005-01-28

Re: Re[2]: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872..

From: Bart De Schuymer <hidden>
Date: 2004-12-18 16:43:26
Also in: lkml

Op za, 18-12-2004 te 19:07 +0300, schreef Crazy AMD K7:
quoted
Note to the original poster: when you report a bug with a patched
kernel always mention it.
I have mentioned earlier and Bart knows it.

I use 2.4.28
+ ebtables-brnf-8_vs_2.4.28.diff
+ U32 patch from patch-o-matic-ng-20040621.tar.bz2
+ patch for br_netfilter.c made by Bart to find out why kernel panic happens(it was a few
  letters ago)
  All patches has applies cleanly.
  U32 doesn't affect on br_netfilter.c
Sorry, I don't know the ip_queue mechanism and I don't know what could
possibly go wrong.
All we know is that you no longer have kernel panics with the simple
patch I gave you (which just drops packets when a kernel panic would
happen otherwise, and tells about this with a printk). However, you
state there are no entries in your syslog that tell about this dropping.
Is your syslog working right? Do you have a console open on which kernel
messages get printed?

I still secretly suspect the snort code of inserting packets back into
the kernel that don't have an output device (I don't know if that's
possible, though).

cheers,
Bart
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help