Thread (60 messages) 60 messages, 26 authors, 2004-09-24

Re: The ultimate TOE design

From: Andrea Arcangeli <hidden>
Date: 2004-09-16 01:13:49
Also in: lkml

On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 01:53:08PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
There are absolutely no justified economics in these
TOE engines.  By the time you deploy them, the cpus
and memory catch up and what's more those are general
purpose and not just for networking as David Stevens
and others have said.
I'm not sure if economics are the worst part of what is being shipped,
to me the worst part is security, I'd never trust myself such a
non-open-source TCP stack for something critical even if it was going to
be much cheaper and performant. Even my PDA is using the linux tcp
stack, and my cell phone only speaks UDP with the wap server anyways.
TCP segment offload OTOH doesn't involve much "intelligence" in the NIC
and it's very reasonable to trust it especially because all the incoming
packets (the real potential offenders) are still processed by the linux
tcp stack.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help