Thread (60 messages) 60 messages, 26 authors, 2004-09-24

Re: The ultimate TOE design

From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2004-09-15 20:58:08
Also in: lkml

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 20:14:22 +0100
Alan Cox [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mer, 2004-09-15 at 21:04, Paul Jakma wrote:
quoted
The intel IXP's are like the above, XScale+extra-bits host-on-a-PCI 
card running Linux. Or is that what you were referring to with 
"<cards exist> but they are all fairly expensive."?
Last time I checked 2Ghz accelerators for intel and AMD were quite cheap
and also had the advantage they ran user mode code when idle from
network processing.
ROFL, and this is my position on this topic as well.

There are absolutely no justified economics in these
TOE engines.  By the time you deploy them, the cpus
and memory catch up and what's more those are general
purpose and not just for networking as David Stevens
and others have said.

TOE is just junk, and we'll reject any attempt to put
that garbage into the kernel.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help