On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 16:27:03 +1000
Herbert Xu [off-list ref] wrote:
Is there any thing that prevents the following scenario from occuring?
CPU0 CPU1
neigh_create
inet_del_ifa
notifier_call_chain
neigh_ifdown
inetdev_destroy
arp_constructor
neigh->parms =
in_dev->arp_parms
in_dev->dead = 1
in_dev->dev->ip_ptr =
NULL
neigh_parms_release
n->parms->neigh_setup => BUG
Is there anything other than hostess_sv11.c, sealevel.c, and shaper.c
which are using n->parms->neigh_setup at all?
This seems to be a very obscure special case hack, which perhaps we
can removee entirely.