Re: [PATCH 1/4] Net device error logging, revised
From: Jeff Garzik <hidden>
Date: 2003-09-03 17:32:24
Also in:
lkml
Jim Keniston wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:quoted
"NETIF_MSG_" is silly and should be eliminated.quoted
From this, I infer that you think that the option to "omit" the msglevel arg --e.g., netdev_err(dev,, "NIC is fried!\n"); /* always logged */ -- is silly. No big deal. Its sole purpose is to help keep netdev_* calls terse.
yes
quoted
A separate "NETIF_MSG_ALL" test is not needed, because msg_enable is a bitmask. A msg_enable of 0xffffffff will naturally create a NETIF_MSG_ALL.But how do you code a netdev_* call where you ALWAYS want the message (including netdev_printk-style prefix) logged, regardless of the value of msg_enable? That's what NETIF_MSG_ALL is for (and why it might be better called NETIF_MSG_ALWAYS)...
I understand the purpose of NETIF_MSG_ALL; re-read what I said. You don't need a separate _test_, as your implementation includes. Defining NETIF_MSG_ALL to 0xffffffff will naturally create the effect you seek.
quoted
Also, whatever mechanism is created, it needs to preserve the feature of the existing system: if (a quick bitmask test) do something And preferably "do something" is not inlined, because printk'ing -- although it may appear in a fast path during debugging -- cannot be considered a fast path itself.
Sorry, I'm not sure what you're getting at here. netdev_* doesn't prevent people from using the existing netif_msg_* macros; it just provides shorthand for the (usual) case where "do something" is "printk".
I would prefer to be more ambitious. If we're gonna go in and change every printk in a driver, we might as well do it right, and (a) make sure the driver does msg_enable, and (b) make the source code a bit more clean by hiding the "if (test bitmap)" test in your netdev_xxx stuff. Jeff