Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port

From
David S. Miller <hidden>
Date
2002-10-03 14:10:58
Reply to
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, 2002-10-03
   From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 [off-list ref]
   Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 23:15:34 +0900 (JST)

   In article [ref] (at Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:01:11 +0400 (MSD)), kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru says:
   
   > What's about the problem, it cannot be a problem for TCP, connection
   > uniqueness is verified by tcp_*_check_established() not depending
   > on value of SO_REUSEADDR. What's about UDP, the problem really might
   > be a real problem, let's defer the issue, it looks absoluteky unrelated.
   
   Hmm, but I'm afraid that different behavior between TCP and UDP would
   confuse users.
   
He is saying we should do the TCP part first to make the patch simpler
and easier to verify.

Then we can investigate the UDP side seperately.
   
   > BTW the question: why is bindv6only in device configuration directory?
   
   Because I thought that net.ipv6.conf is the place for all 
   configuration...

It is for interface level configuration.
   
   Do you propose to move it to parent directory (net.ipv6.bindv6only),
   and put other general settings there?
   
Yes.
Thread (33 messages) 33 messages, 7 authors, last reply 2002-10-25
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help