From: Pekka Savola [off-list ref]
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:18:53 +0300 (EEST)
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
> So does it make no sense at all to have IP_V4ONLY?
Umm, I think an app guy can do that with creating an AF_INET socket; there
will not be IPv6 there. Folks Who Think They Know Best decided that dual
use for AF_INET6 would be best, and IPV6_V6ONLY was invented (note: it'd
already implemented by some others) to repair that.
Ok, ignore my silly idea then.
Let us continue with verifying correctness of the USAGI
patch.