Thread (64 messages) flat view 64 messages, 15 authors, 2002-09-17

Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000

From: Martin J. Bligh <hidden>
Date: 2002-09-11 14:08:20
Also in: lkml

quoted
quoted
Ie. the headers that don't need to go across the bus are the critical
resource saved by TSO.
I'm not sure that's entirely true in this case - the Netfinity
8500R is slightly unusual in that it has 3 or 4 PCI buses, and
there's 4 - 8 gigabit ethernet cards in this beast spread around
different buses (Troy - are we still just using 4? ... and what's
the raw bandwidth of data we're pushing? ... it's not huge). 

I think we're CPU limited (there's no idle time on this machine), 
which is odd for an 8 CPU 900MHz P3 Xeon,
Quite possibly.  The P3 has roughly an 800MB/s FSB bandwidth, that must
be used for both I/O and memory accesses.  So just driving a gige card at
wire speed takes a considerable portion of the cpus capacity.  

On analyzing this kind of thing I usually find it quite helpful to
compute what the hardware can theoretically to get a feel where the
bottlenecks should be.
We can push about 420MB/s of IO out of this thing (out of that 
theoretical 800Mb/s). Specweb is only pushing about 120MB/s of
total data through it, so it's not bus limited in this case.
Of course, I should have given you that data to start with, 
but ... ;-)

M.

PS. This thing actually has 3 system buses, 1 for each of the two
sets of 4 CPUs, and 1 for all the PCI buses, and the three buses
are joined by an interconnect in the middle. But all the IO goes
through 1 of those buses, so for the purposes of this discussion,
it makes no difference whatsoever ;-)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help