Thread (64 messages) 64 messages, 15 authors, 2002-09-17

Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000

From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2002-09-06 15:34:52
Also in: lkml

Martin J. Bligh wrote:
quoted
Stupid question, are you sure you have CONFIG_E1000_NAPI enabled?

NAPI is also not the panacea to all problems in the world.
No, but I didn't expect throughput to drop by 40% or so either,
which is (very roughly) what happened. Interrupts are a pain to
manage and do affinity with, so NAPI should (at least in theory)
be better for this kind of setup ... I think.
No, no.  Bad Martin!  Throughput didn't drop, "Specweb compliance" dropped. 
  Those are two very, very different things.  I've found that the server 
can produce a lot more throughput, although it doesn't have the 
characteristics that Specweb considers compliant.  Just have Troy enable 
mod-status and look at the throughput that Apache tells you that it is 
giving during a run.  _That_ is real throughput, not number of compliant 
connections.

_And_ NAPI is for receive only, right?  Also, my compliance drop occurs 
with the NAPI checkbox disabled.  There is something else in the new driver 
that causes our problems.

-- 
Dave Hansen
haveblue@us.ibm.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help