Re: Network oops

"David S. Miller" wrote:

   From: george anzinger [off-list ref]
   Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 07:16:24 -0700

[ BTW please start using newlines in your emails, instead of 1,000
  character monstrosities lacking them.  Thanks ]

Sure.  I am trying to find something that works with patches
as well as text.  Still looking I guess.

   On the other hand, I prefer to think of the linux community as a
   group of folks working on making one of the best OSs on the planet
   even better.

Right, and I don't think CONFIG_PREEMPT makes the planet better.
In fact, now that you mention it, I think CONFIG_PREEMPT is a pile
of crap.

Can we agree to disagree :)

   > It requires a full audit of the networking in the new preemption
   > environment.

   Any pointers on what to look for would be welcome.

And you go right back to asking me to do the work for you.
What is wrong with you?

I said they would be welcome, not that you have to reply...

-- 
George Anzinger   george@mvista.com
High-res-timers: 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Real time sched:  http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtsched/
Preemption patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml