Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 5 authors, 2019-07-20

Re: [PATCH] selftests/livepatch: add test skip handling

From: shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
Date: 2019-07-19 22:11:14
Also in: linux-kselftest

On 7/14/19 8:33 AM, Joe Lawrence wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 10:28:29AM -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote:
quoted
Before running a livpeatch self-test, first verify that we've built and
installed the livepatch self-test kernel modules by running a 'modprobe
--dry-run'.  This should catch a few environment issues, including
!CONFIG_LIVEPATCH and !CONFIG_TEST_LIVEPATCH.  In these cases, exit
gracefully with test-skip status rather than test-fail status.

Reported-by: Jiri Benc <redacted>
Suggested-by: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
---
  tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/functions.sh | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
  .../selftests/livepatch/test-callbacks.sh      |  5 +++++
  .../selftests/livepatch/test-livepatch.sh      |  3 +++
  .../selftests/livepatch/test-shadow-vars.sh    |  2 ++
  4 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/functions.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/functions.sh
index 30195449c63c..92d6cfb49365 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/functions.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/functions.sh
@@ -13,6 +13,14 @@ function log() {
  	echo "$1" > /dev/kmsg
  }
  
+# skip(msg) - testing can't proceed
+#	msg - explanation
+function skip() {
+	log "SKIP: $1"
+	echo "SKIP: $1" >&2
+	exit 4
+}
+
  # die(msg) - game over, man
  #	msg - dying words
  function die() {
@@ -43,6 +51,16 @@ function loop_until() {
  	done
  }
  
+function assert_mod() {
+	local mod="$1"
+
+	if ! modprobe --dry-run "$mod" &>/dev/null ; then
+		skip "Failed modprobe --dry-run of module: $mod"
+	fi
+
+	return 1
+}
+
  function is_livepatch_mod() {
  	local mod="$1"
  
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-callbacks.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-callbacks.sh
index e97a9dcb73c7..87a407cee7fd 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-callbacks.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-callbacks.sh
@@ -9,6 +9,11 @@ MOD_LIVEPATCH2=test_klp_callbacks_demo2
  MOD_TARGET=test_klp_callbacks_mod
  MOD_TARGET_BUSY=test_klp_callbacks_busy
  
+assert_mod $MOD_LIVEPATCH
+assert_mod $MOD_LIVEPATCH2
+assert_mod $MOD_TARGET
+assert_mod $MOD_TARGET_BUSY
+
  set_dynamic_debug
  
  
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-livepatch.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-livepatch.sh
index f05268aea859..8d3b75ceeeff 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-livepatch.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-livepatch.sh
@@ -7,6 +7,9 @@
  MOD_LIVEPATCH=test_klp_livepatch
  MOD_REPLACE=test_klp_atomic_replace
  
+assert_mod $MOD_LIVEPATCH
+assert_mod $MOD_REPLACE
+
  set_dynamic_debug
  
  
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-shadow-vars.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-shadow-vars.sh
index 04a37831e204..1ab09bc50363 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-shadow-vars.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-shadow-vars.sh
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
  
  MOD_TEST=test_klp_shadow_vars
  
+assert_mod $MOD_TEST
+
  set_dynamic_debug
  
  
-- 
2.21.0
Testing:

Here's the output if modprobe --dry-run doesn't like the modules (not
built, etc.):

   TAP version 13
   selftests: livepatch: test-livepatch.sh
   ========================================
   SKIP: Failed modprobe --dry-run of module: test_klp_livepatch
   not ok 1..1 selftests: livepatch: test-livepatch.sh [SKIP]
   selftests: livepatch: test-callbacks.sh
   ========================================
   SKIP: Failed modprobe --dry-run of module: test_klp_callbacks_demo
   not ok 1..2 selftests: livepatch: test-callbacks.sh [SKIP]
   selftests: livepatch: test-shadow-vars.sh
   ========================================
   SKIP: Failed modprobe --dry-run of module: test_klp_shadow_vars
   not ok 1..3 selftests: livepatch: test-shadow-vars.sh [SKIP]

We could fold assert_mod() into __load_mod() if folks perfer.  I
don't have strong opinion either way.
Please refine these messages to say what users should do. In addition
to what failed, also add what is missing - enable config option etc.

thanks,
-- Shuah
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help