On 24/07/2026 15:14, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 02:36:59PM +0100, Usama Arif wrote:
quoted
On 24/07/2026 11:20, Pedro Falcato wrote:
quoted
ptep_get() does not need write access to the PTE.
Signed-off-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
---
arch/parisc/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
hmm I think you might break build bisectibility if
you separate out the patches, you should squash patch 3 and 4,
with patch 1.
I don't see how this breaks bisectability. Can you elaborate on what
you think would break?
Patch 1 does:
-static inline pte_t ptep_get_lockless(pte_t *ptep)
+static inline pte_t ptep_get_lockless(const pte_t *ptep)
{
return ptep_get(ptep);
}
ptep_get() takes a non-const arg till patch 3 for example for parsic.
I don't think you can pass a const variable to non const function arg?
So parsic won't compile in patch 1 and 2, powerprc wont compile
for patches 1, 2 and 3..