Thread (41 messages) 41 messages, 8 authors, 2026-02-25

Re: [PATCH 07/15] cpufreq: ondemand: Simplify idle cputime granularity test

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-01-19 12:30:21
Also in: linux-pm, linux-s390, lkml

On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 3:53 PM Frederic Weisbecker [off-list ref] wrote:
cpufreq calls get_cpu_idle_time_us() just to know if idle cputime
accounting has a nanoseconds granularity.

Use the appropriate indicator instead to make that deduction.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) <rafael@kernel.org>

or please let me know if you want me to take this patch.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
index a6ecc203f7b7..2d52ee035702 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -334,17 +334,12 @@ static void od_free(struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs)
 static int od_init(struct dbs_data *dbs_data)
 {
        struct od_dbs_tuners *tuners;
-       u64 idle_time;
-       int cpu;

        tuners = kzalloc(sizeof(*tuners), GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!tuners)
                return -ENOMEM;

-       cpu = get_cpu();
-       idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu, NULL);
-       put_cpu();
-       if (idle_time != -1ULL) {
+       if (tick_nohz_enabled) {
                /* Idle micro accounting is supported. Use finer thresholds */
                dbs_data->up_threshold = MICRO_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD;
        } else {
--
2.51.1
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help