Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] mm: introduce CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_LAZY_MMU_MODE
From: Kevin Brodsky <hidden>
Date: 2025-11-06 10:33:34
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, lkml, sparclinux, xen-devel
On 05/11/2025 04:40, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
Kevin Brodsky [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Architectures currently opt in for implementing lazy_mmu helpers by defining __HAVE_ARCH_ENTER_LAZY_MMU_MODE. In preparation for introducing a generic lazy_mmu layer that will require storage in task_struct, let's switch to a cleaner approach: instead of defining a macro, select a CONFIG option. This patch introduces CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_LAZY_MMU_MODE and has each arch select it when it implements lazy_mmu helpers. __HAVE_ARCH_ENTER_LAZY_MMU_MODE is removed and <linux/pgtable.h> relies on the new CONFIG instead. On x86, lazy_mmu helpers are only implemented if PARAVIRT_XXL is selected. This creates some complications in arch/x86/boot/, because a few files manually undefine PARAVIRT* options. As a result <asm/paravirt.h> does not define the lazy_mmu helpers, but this breaks the build as <linux/pgtable.h> only defines them if !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_LAZY_MMU_MODE. There does not seem to be a clean way out of this - let's just undefine that new CONFIG too. Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <redacted> --- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 + arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 1 - arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush-hash.h | 2 -- arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype | 1 + arch/sparc/Kconfig | 1 + arch/sparc/include/asm/tlbflush_64.h | 2 -- arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h | 1 + arch/x86/boot/startup/sme.c | 1 + arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 1 - include/linux/pgtable.h | 2 +- mm/Kconfig | 3 +++ 12 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)Maybe we can add this to ... ? Documentation/features/vm/lazy_mmu/arch-support.txt # # Feature name: lazy_mmu mode # Kconfig: ARCH_HAS_LAZY_MMU_MODE # description: arch supports arch_{enter|flush|leave}_lazy_mmu_mode() # ----------------------- | arch |status| ----------------------- | arm64: | ok | | powerpc: | ok | | sparc: | ok | | x86: | ok | -----------------------
That's an interesting idea but I'm not sure it really makes sense for lazy MMU? AFAIU these arch-support.txt files are meant to help identify which generic features an arch has support for. Lazy MMU isn't really a feature though, in the sense that what it does is entirely defined by the arch. This patch does introduce a generic layer, but ultimately it remains a collection of arch hooks.
As for this patch, the changes are mostly straight forward around the configs part. This looks good to me. Please feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Thanks for the review! - Kevin