Thread (80 messages) 80 messages, 8 authors, 2025-11-24

Re: [PATCH v4 08/12] arm64: mm: replace TIF_LAZY_MMU with in_lazy_mmu_mode()

From: David Hildenbrand <hidden>
Date: 2025-11-03 16:03:49
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, lkml, sparclinux, xen-devel

On 29.10.25 11:09, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The generic lazy_mmu layer now tracks whether a task is in lazy MMU
mode. As a result we no longer need a TIF flag for that purpose -
let's use the new in_lazy_mmu_mode() helper instead.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <redacted>
---
  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h     | 16 +++-------------
  arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h |  3 +--
  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 535435248923..61ca88f94551 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -62,30 +62,21 @@ static inline void emit_pte_barriers(void)
  
  static inline void queue_pte_barriers(void)
  {
-	unsigned long flags;
-
  	if (in_interrupt()) {
  		emit_pte_barriers();
  		return;
  	}
  
-	flags = read_thread_flags();
-
-	if (flags & BIT(TIF_LAZY_MMU)) {
-		/* Avoid the atomic op if already set. */
-		if (!(flags & BIT(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING)))
-			set_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING);
-	} else {
+	if (in_lazy_mmu_mode())
+		test_and_set_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING);
You likely don't want a test_and_set here, which would do a 
test_and_set_bit() -- an atomic rmw.

You only want to avoid the atomic write if already set.

So keep the current

	/* Avoid the atomic op if already set. */
	if (!(flags & BIT(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING)))
		set_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING);

-- 
Cheers

David

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help