Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Date: 2025-10-20 10:10:11
Also in:
linux-pci, lkml
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Date: 2025-10-20 10:10:11
Also in:
linux-pci, lkml
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 10:41:57AM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c@@ -253,6 +254,16 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_warn(bridge, "subordinate device reset failed\n"); goto failed; } + + /* Link recovered, report fatal errors of RCiEP or EP */ + if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen && + (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT || type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END)) { + aer_add_error_device(&info, dev); + info.severity = AER_FATAL; + if (aer_get_device_error_info(&info, 0, true)) + aer_print_error(&info, 0); + pci_dev_put(dev); + } }
Where is the the pci_dev_get() to balance the pci_dev_put() here? It feels awkward to leak AER-specific details into pcie_do_recovery(). That function is supposed to implement the flow described in Documentation/PCI/pci-error-recovery.rst in a platform-agnostic way so that powerpc (EEH) and s390 could conceivably take advantage of it. Can you find a way to avoid this, e.g. report errors after pcie_do_recovery() has concluded? I'm also worried that errors are reported *during* recovery. I imagine this looks confusing to a user. The logged messages should make it clear that these are errors that occurred *earlier* and are reported belatedly. Thanks, Lukas