Re: [PATCH 6/8] CMDLINE: x86: convert to generic builtin command line
From: Daniel Walker (danielwa) <hidden>
Date: 2025-10-02 23:40:29
Also in:
linux-mips, lkml
On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 02:55:07PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
On 10/2/25 14:31, Daniel Walker (danielwa) wrote: ...quoted
quoted
BTW, your series looks like a *really* good idea. Please don't let it die. But you might want to trim it down a bit. I'd probably remove the tests and the 'insert-sys-cert' changes to make it more approachable to folks.Since x86 is asking for it I think it would trim it down to just what is needed for x86. If I don't trim down the architectures it ropes in too many people anyway.That's not a bad idea. Or, even if you can pick two amenable architectures to start with it will make it really obvious that this is useful. Two architectures means a *lot*, IMNHO. Two is a billion times better than one.
ARM64 has also request this series in the past, but I don't know what their current code looks like since my last submissions.
quoted
The biggest issue is that libstub would need to be modified, but I've never had any luck getting the libstub maintainer to review anything. I suspect he would ignore private email too, particularly from people he's doesn't know.Are you talking about Ard? EXTENSIBLE FIRMWARE INTERFACE (EFI) M: Ard Biesheuvel [off-list ref] L: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org S: Maintained ... F: drivers/firmware/efi/ F: include/linux/efi*.h
Yes I think so.
He's a pretty nice guy and has been active in this thread, so I'm kinda surprised to hear you're having a hard time there. I'd just try asking nicely. I'm pretty sure he's "ardb" on the usual IRC networks. IRC is a great alternative when you're having problems getting your emails seen in the normal email flood.
That was the first response from him over many submissions. Which channels are popular on IRC ?
BTW, reading the changelog for libstub, it wasn't clear to me that changes there were _required_ for the series to go forward. For instance, is the x86 patch useful without libstub changes?
I think it is required because x86 can be compiled with libstub and the changes take effect for the whole kernel when compiled for that architecture. libstub uses the Kconfig options directly which I modify in the series, so there would need to be some compatibility changes. Daniel