On Thu, 2025-10-02 at 16:10 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:

How is the approach to "keep it atomic" working out so far? ;)

The kernel isn't exactly developed in secret. It's also not hard at all
to, say, once a week to peek at linux-next and do a lore search (or use
lei) if anyone is desperately worried about the ~50 lines per
architecture going out of sync.

With all due respect, the lack of action on this patchset is not at all
due to its scope, but purely due to the throwing-spaghetti-at-the-wall
approach to code review that you yourself just got done pointing out.
Addressing the latter problem would thereby also address the former.