Le 20/05/2025 à 04:32, Herbert Xu a écrit :

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 03:55:16PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:

quoted

As far as I can see related patches found in linux-next tree were not sent
to linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org.

I just checked and it was definitely sent to linuxppc-dev:

Oops sorry, my mistake.

I see them in patchwork, they still have status 'New'.

Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Crypto Mailing List <redacted>, Venkat Rao Bagalkote <redacted>, Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>, Stephen Rothwell <redacted>, Danny Tsen <redacted>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

quoted

Could you resend them, and split out the introduction of
CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 from other parts of patch "crypto:
powerpc/poly1305 - Add SIMD fallback" and add the lib/tishift.S in the patch
which adds CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 ?

I'll just revert them and mark powerpc/poly1305 as broken.  You
guys can sort it out later.

Fine, lets do that and make sure all necessary bits are there when 
enabling CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128

Thanks
Christophe